|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Exotic Bush Honeysuckle Control Trial
Cooperators: Purdue University Department of Forestry and Natural Resources,
Vigo County Parks Department, and Townsend Chemical
Objective: Test efficacy of various herbicide combinations in selectively
controlling
Asian bush honeysuckles in a mature forest setting, while protecting native
understory vegetation,
using hand application equipment.
Treatments 2 – 7 tested three combinations of foliar herbicides
applied using backpack sprayers in
both early spring and late summer in an effort to minimize damage to native
understory vegetation.
Treatment 8 applies herbicide in an oil carrier (AXIT), with an adjustable
cone nozzle on a backpack
sprayer, to the lower 15 inches of the stem. The oil penetrates the bark
and delivers the herbicide into
the plant’s vascular system. Treatment 9 is a variation on basal bark
treatments in that the herbicide/oil
mix is sprayed on the base of the stem as a pencil-lead thick stream. This
is supposed to be effective
on young, small diameter stems while reducing overall the amount of herbicide
applied. Treatments 10
and 11 involve cutting the shrubs off at the base using a chainsaw and spraying
the freshly cut stump
surface with herbicide. This was done as a two-person crew (Chainsaw operator
and applicator using
a backpack sprayer)
Results:
Table 1 presents Asian bush honeysuckle percent mortality resulting from the respective treatments. Shrub size influenced treatment efficacy. The largest size class (8’+ tall) was difficult to thoroughly treat with foliar applications using backpack sprayers. Inevitably, the highest portions of the crowns received little herbicide. Both cut stump treatments were 100% effective in killing the largest size class. The basal bark treatment was only partially effective (43% control) (Figure 2), while streamline delivered far too little herbicide to most of these large shrubs to be effective.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Foliar applications of glyphosate and triclopyr+imazapyr were very effective
on intermediate (4.5’ – 8’) and
small (2’ – 4.5’) size shrubs, in both the spring and fall
applications (Figures 3 - 6). Triclopyr alone produced
only 56% mortality when applied to intermediate size shrubs in the spring and
only 4% mortality in the fall.
The basal bark treatment did not improve with the smaller two size
classes. The streamline treatment
killed approximately 30% of the shrubs in both the smaller size classes which
was not significantly different
from the basal bark treatment where more herbicide is being applied. Cut stump
treatment efficacies declined
a little in the intermediate size class and significantly in the small size class
shrubs. This was due to the
increasing difficulty of a chainsaw operator finding and cutting smaller shrubs.
Table 1. |
Mortality by Shrub Size Class |
|||
Treatment |
Herbicide |
8’+ |
4.5’ – 8’ |
2’ – 4.5’ |
|
|
------------------( % )---------------- |
||
Control |
- |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Foliar, Spring |
4% Garlon 3A |
50 |
56 |
74 |
Foliar, Spring |
3% Garlon 3A + 1/8% |
44 |
90 |
98 |
Foliar, Spring |
5% GlyproPlus, |
26 |
90 |
97 |
Foliar, Fall |
4% Garlon 3A |
0 |
4 |
0 |
Foliar, Fall |
3% Garlon 3A + 1/8% Arsenal |
- |
78 |
82 |
Foliar, Fall |
4% GlyproPlus, |
43 |
89 |
84 |
Basal Bark |
20% Garlon 4 |
21 |
40 |
40 |
Streamline |
20% Garlon 4 |
0 |
32 |
30 |
Cut Stump |
Pathway |
100 |
86 |
4 |
Cut Stump |
20% Garlon 4 |
100 |
71 |
7 |
Additional research is being conducted on basal bark treatments to try to
develop protocols that will
assure the successful application of this option to bush honeysuckle control.
Tests involve five different
herbicide combinations, four different oil carriers, six different application
dates over the course of one year,
applied to two different shrub size classes.
Cost estimates are being developed for different control strategies applied
under a range of bush honeysuckle
stand characteristics.
Ron Rathfon, Extension Forester
Purdue University, Department of Forestry & Natural Resources
12000 Purdue Farm Road
Dubois, IN 47527
812-678-5049
ronr@purdue.edu
Return to Control and Management Page
For more information, contact MIPN via e-mail: Info at MIPN.org